My big sister's not the kinda gal who a) uses bumper stickers, or b) quotes bumper stickers in group emails. But she is a pretty solid Massachusetts liberal (albeit one whose parents almost always vote Republican). She sent this out yesterday (Tuesday) during the day:
By the way, here is what I noticed on the blogosphere during the 24-48 hours leading up to the election, and during the election itself: There was nothing to read. Dearth. Silence. The whole history of the world's at stake, and considering the importance of the event, nobody really had jack shit to say about it. Strange.
I had (and still have) trouble articulating this question in any meaningful way, but I'll hazard a try. I turned to a friend last night (watching the show at Zlata Hvezda sports bar, same place I saw the Rex Sox win the World Series) and asked: "What does it mean that these two elections are so close? Why? How?"
He replied, "Because half the country's completely stupid."
That wasn't the type of answer I was looking for. What I meant to ask was, Is it mere chance, or is there something about the current state of our political system that tends to produce candidates who divide the country almost exactly in half?
*
Off to Dublin for four days to visit my girlfriend. If there's any place in particular you think I should visit, or something I should do, please drop a line in the comments box.
By the way, things are slowly proceeding with the sale of Tulip. At the moment I'm not actually entertaining any serious offers, but it's heartening to know that word is starting to filter out -- to the right people -- that the restaurant is, heh heh, "in play." One blog reader was seriously interested, but it fell apart at the last minute due to a disagreement with his possible future business partner. It would be tremendously cool if I were to hand Tulip off to a reader of this blog.
Hi all,Not hilarious, but prescient, and I guess that sums things up. I'm not going to bother getting depressed about this. It's at least comforting to know that about half the country basically feels the way I do about the situation. And it strenthens the case for northern seccession.
I'm not much into bumper stickers, but when I heard this one quoted on NPR
yesterday, it struck a chord:
FRODO FAILED
BUSH HAS THE RING
By the way, here is what I noticed on the blogosphere during the 24-48 hours leading up to the election, and during the election itself: There was nothing to read. Dearth. Silence. The whole history of the world's at stake, and considering the importance of the event, nobody really had jack shit to say about it. Strange.
I had (and still have) trouble articulating this question in any meaningful way, but I'll hazard a try. I turned to a friend last night (watching the show at Zlata Hvezda sports bar, same place I saw the Rex Sox win the World Series) and asked: "What does it mean that these two elections are so close? Why? How?"
He replied, "Because half the country's completely stupid."
That wasn't the type of answer I was looking for. What I meant to ask was, Is it mere chance, or is there something about the current state of our political system that tends to produce candidates who divide the country almost exactly in half?
*
Off to Dublin for four days to visit my girlfriend. If there's any place in particular you think I should visit, or something I should do, please drop a line in the comments box.
By the way, things are slowly proceeding with the sale of Tulip. At the moment I'm not actually entertaining any serious offers, but it's heartening to know that word is starting to filter out -- to the right people -- that the restaurant is, heh heh, "in play." One blog reader was seriously interested, but it fell apart at the last minute due to a disagreement with his possible future business partner. It would be tremendously cool if I were to hand Tulip off to a reader of this blog.
posted by Scott at 1:01 PM
<-- use as a back-up
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home